Categories
Other

I need an expert writer in PhD thesis in Applied linguistics. The title of my s

Need Help With your assignment? Get expert academic writing assistance! We can write any paper on any subject within the tightest time.

Hire A Writer

I need an
expert writer in PhD thesis in Applied linguistics.
The title
of my study is: Exploring the use of technology in English Language Classes in
Islamic Schools in Canada Through a Cultural -Historical Activity Theory Lens:
difficulties and opportunities for development.
The key
principles of my study are:
A
longitudinal case study for one year.
Instruments:
Teachers’ interviews and classroom observations ( ten teachers from two
schools) The interviews and observations were conducted three times ( November
2021, February 2022, and June 2022)
Number of
participants: 5 teachers from each school
Research
design/ Qualitative
Research
paradigm (constructivism/interpretivism)
I wrote
the Methodology Chapter, and I got feedback from the supervisor.
Key
journals
1-
I need to replace the references to be from the key
journals in Education and Applied linguistics such as:
·
Applied
Linguistics
·
*System
·
*ELT Journal
·
*Language Learning
·
*Language Teaching
·
*Language Teaching Research
·
*TESOL Quarterly *Journal of Second Language
Writing
·
*Modern Language Journal
The supervisor’s feed back in general
Some subtitles need to be merged to
avoid repetition
The current structure still needs some
work. I think you could combine some sections together to make the writing flow
better. For instance, you can merge Research Paradigm, Research Approach, and
Research Methods into one section. In doing so, you avoid repeating yourself.
In addition, when you are talking about research methods, put all the research
methods together. Currently, you put sampling in-between case study and
interviews/classroom observations. (REORDER your chapter) There are still some
issues in your research methods section. You need to justify your choice of
research methods by linking to your research purposes and research questions,
not linking with the theoretical framework for the study: CHAT. Although you
talk about the strengths of using interviews and classroom observations, where
are the weaknesses of these methods? And how are you going to mitigate these
weaknesses in your own study? I remember I pointed this out at our previous
meeting. Choice of word: ‘tool’. I mentioned this last time that we don’t use
tool to describe the research method. Just wondering whether there are any
particular reasons that you insist on using this word. As case study is the key
feature of your research, you need to give detailed information about the two
schools. For details, please see my in-text comments. Limitations. You are
expected to discuss about limitations in the Discussion Chapter, not in the
methodology chapter.
Please see
attached feedback on your Methodology Chapter. I am writing the overall comment
here because the format becomes messy once I try to write in your document.
I think
you have addressed some of the issues we raised at the previous meeting such as
deleting the part on philosophical stance in research, and the overall
structure is better. But there are some issues.
The
current structure still needs some work. I think you could combine some
sections together to make the writing flow better. For instance, you can
merge Research Paradigm, Research Approach, and Research Methods into one
section. In doing so, you avoid repeating yourself.
In
addition, when you are talking about research methods, put all the
research methods together. Currently you put sampling in-between case
study and interviews/classroom observations.
There
are still some issues in your research methods section. You need to
justify your choice of research methods by linking to your research
purposes and research questions, not linking with the theoretical
framework for the study: CHAT. Although you talk about the strengths of
using interviews and classroom observations, where are the weaknesses of
these methods? And how are you going to mitigate these weaknesses in your
own study? I remember I pointed this out at our previous meeting.
Choice
of word: ‘tool’. I mentioned this last time that we don’t use tool to
describe research method. Just wondering whether there are any particular
reasons that you insist on using this word.
As
case study is the key feature of your research, you need to give detailed
information about the two schools. For details, please see my in-text
comments.
Limitations.
You are expected to discuss about limitations in the Discussion Chapter,
not in the methodology chapter.

Need Help With your assignment? Get expert academic writing assistance! We can write any paper on any subject within the tightest time.

Hire A Writer

Leave a Reply